Tab
Benoit— Katrina ÒScattered
People Instead of BombsÓ
An
Interview with Tab Benoit in Houma, LAAn
Interview With Tab Benoit in New Orleans
Part One
ÒThis Katrina thing was handled as if it would have been
Iraq. It was handled in a military way for resources; resources were the main
focus, and the only difference is that the hurricane scattered people instead
of bombs. There were people getting shot, there were bodies everywhere, there
was destruction everywhere, and thereÕs oil coming out of the ground like it
never has before. Remind you of something else? The only difference is that we
didnÕt have the equipment and the ability to fight back.Ó
—Tab
Benoit, HNew Orleans,ouma, Louisiana November
2007
Tab Benoit is a Cajun man, first and foremost. He loves his
country and is not afraid to say so. His pride in his heritage is only part of
what drives this popular up-and-coming Louisiana blues musician to fight
ferociously for a way of life and rich culture that areis destined to be eradicated by big oil,
big money, and big government.. Billboard Magazine praises Benoit
for a Òthorough command of contemporary
bluesÉsplendid songwriting, gritty vocals and choice lead guitar work.,"
The producers
of the IMAX film, Hurricane on the
Bayou, thought so too and cast Benoit as the star
celebrity voice in the film, which has been viewed around the world since its
premiere in 2006. The film was
produced by the Audubon Nature
Institute and partially
financed
by the State of Louisiana
and Shell Oil.
Hurricane Katrina and the floods that followed were
a wake-up call to America, and Benoit wants to
use his celebrity voice to ensure that America hears and heeds the warning.
MBenoit is more
than simply driven—Tab Benoithe seems possessed of a certainty that
he is destined to be one voice of and for the Louisiana wetlands. He told us
that many more voices were needed so that big government Òcannot kill us all.Ó
We heard more than once from residents of South Louisiana that government Òis
trying to kill us all.Ó We were also asked on several occasions whether
Louisiana was still considered to be part of the United States, so BenoitÕs
statement did not surprise us.
Unhappy and unfulfilled as a pilot flying the pipelines for the oil companies, BenoitTabhe
wanted to contribute more to his town, state, country and the world—---and
says so in no uncertain terms. Becoming a professional musician gave Benoit the
opportunity to connect with a huge audience and tell them that, yes,yes;; the wetlands will disappear in our
lifetime if we do not do something about it. Big oil and big government have a
vested interest in this happening. He tried to get his warning across in the IMAX film, Hurricane on the
Bayou, but feels his message was
diminished and co-opted by Shell Oil when Shell Oil Company picked up the cost overruns after when on the
film was extended to include Katrina.
The job of the journalist is to be a storyteller.
We do our job best when we get out of the way and let the truth unfold. Tab Benoit has a handle on the truth
of what happened in southern Louisiana before Hurricane Katrina and after the
flood of 2005 devastated New Orleans. He recently spent
several hours on a bayou outside of Houma, Louisiana (LA) in the deepening
November twilight and told his story. It was a story we had heard many times in
the six weeks we spent in south Louisiana, but Benoit has an especially eloquent and knowledgeable
intellectvoice. and wants to use his celebrity voice to ensure that America hears and
heeds the warning offered by Hurricane Katrina, the devastating floods, and the private and corporate take-overs, which followed.
He echoes Naomi KleinÕs assessment in her book, Shock
Doctrine, that within days of Katrina and the floods that followed it was
as if private contractors had recreated BaghdadÕs Green Zone on the bayous.[1] He talks about the importance of the earthÕs swamps, deltas and coastal
wetlands,, the Mississippi
deltas of el sewhere, and without mentioning names he echoes the trauma
and terror spread by big oilÕs
unholy alliance with
dictatorships throughout the vast mangrove wetlands of the
Niger River Ddelta, the vast elephant swamps of GambaGambia, Gabon, and
the once wild waterways of Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Burma. But the story here is America, and we
donÕt want to believe this can
happen to us. Tab Benoit
gives us a chance to look it straight in the eye and name it for what it is—: disaster capitalism, and
war against America.
Tab Benoit is a strong man, and but the passion in his voice belies the sorrowsrws of a heavy heart.: Oone can supposetell tone gives one
the impression he has shed tears over what has happened. Our investigative series to come In future installations of this series, the results
of our investigations will support the truth behind BenoitÕs
observations, but first it is equally
important that the first voice readers need to hear
the voice is that of
a local warrior. Tab Benoit isI sthat
voice, and he speaks for for the environment, the people of Louisiana, and the truth.
Wee did not ask
questions. Instead, we
turned on the flash recorder and let Benoit roll
with his story—uninterrupted——and he did not stop for almost
three hours. Here is Tab BenoitÕs
The following is his uneditedunedited
testimony and witness to the wetlands, a hurricane, an IMAX movie, and what we
all can look forward to if something is not done to change the chokehold alliance betweenof big oil,
industry, warmaking,
and Homeland Security and private profit on Louisiana.
We put in a few headers to headers and clarifying
notes to break up the narrative—and it is a stunning narrative--Here is some straight talk from a
plainspoken Cajun man.
On the Attitude of Big
Government Toward the Citizens of Coastal Louisiana
ÒWe get the feeling that they just donÕt want us here.
ÒAnd my feeling is because of oil, b. Because weÕve got a lot of it
here. And weÕre the only state
that doesnÕt get the off shore drilling money. We get our on shore money but
not from off shore and weÕre the only state. So as we lose land and as that
becomes off shore, then the federal government gets the royalties from that.
ÒThree miles off the coast is considered off shore. I mean
just right here, right now, if I could take you up in an airplane and show you
this; youÕd see that the Ggulf
[of Mexico] used to be 25 miles from
the Houma airport, now itÕs three miles.Ó
Vanishing Wetlands
ÒThere are thousands of [oil] canals dug.
ÒI used to fly pipelines. I flew pipeline patrols where you
would go out in an airplane and fly pipelines to the marshes. You come to these
[oil] hubs and your line may come off
of that hub and come in another direction andÉ. itÕs just like spider webs out
there. All of these canals were dug to bring these pipelines in and to do
drilling. And all of that costs money. The oil companies would rather not have
to do all of that digging and dredging to put a rig in there. It costs them
money. They would rather not go out and directional drill under the city to get
the oil thatÕs under there[the city].
ÒI mean, come on, and letÕs face it. Wherever there iÕs
a swamp—, or
was a swamp—p, thereÕs
oil. ItÕs like that across the planet. ItÕs not just us. We just happen to live
on third largest delta system on the planet, which is the Mississippi River
Delta, which has been a swamp for eons and has been producing oil for a long
time. The fact is, we have a lot of oil here, and itÕs a lot cheaper to get it
if you can just drill straight down into it, you know, part of the reason
theyÕre saying that New Orleans has sunk so much is because of taking oil from
underneath. And every time you take oil out of a hole, somethingÕs gotta give.
ÒWe [Louisiana] haÕve
got 4,000 rigs in the gulfGulf, .c Compared
to 100 rigs in the rest of the gulfGulf. There are 4,100 rigs
approximately in the entire GulfGulf of Mexico;, Louisiana has 4,000. WeÕre not getting the money from the
off shore drilling. WeÕre getting the money from on shore. We get the stateÕs
given royalty rate from the on shore drilling but not from off shore. So it
doesnÕt take a genius to figure out why thereÕd be 4,000 rigs in Louisiana
waters, and only 100 rigs outside of Louisiana waters that belong to the United
States. The federal government gets our [(LouisianaÕs]) share. It goes straight into the
federal fund. ThatÕs been our big issue; [and] weÕve
fought for it.Ó
Big Oil Money
ÒAfter Katrina it was like pulling teeth to get something
through Congress to give us some offshore royalty back, but they didnÕt give us
a percentage. They gave us $20 million per year. ItÕs $20 million per year for
the first 10 years and then something else after that. And itÕs not even a
percentage. The amount of money coming out of here youÕd never know. Nobody
knows. I donÕt think [(we
are])
allowed to know. Because itÕs that much.
ÒHereÕs where the oil port is. Just 20 miles southeast of
here is Port Fourchon, where all the imported oil and the gulfGulf oil comes in that runs through a
pipeline up to the refineries. IÕve been saying that we produce 60% of our own
oil but IÕve seen recently on the news that we import 60% of our oil now. So,
we only produce 40% of what we use. So if weÕre importing 60% that means
Louisiana is that much more important because this is where the oil port is.
Because we have coastal oil refineries.
ÒMR. GO stands for Mississippi River GulfGulf Outlet. It was a canal that was
dug just south of New Orleans, coming out of the 9th ward and St.
Bernard parish—-- this
canal was dug to go straight out to the GulfGulf. But it runs to two major
refiners. WhatÕs behind the 9th ward? Two major refineries. Those
things are running. The refineries are running. Nothing else is [running] in the ninth ward. [(( The
lower Ninth Ward, mostly black and poor, has been depopulated since Katrina.])) What else do you need to know? There
it is. There are the answers.Ó
FEMA and Homeland Security
Rescues Oil But Aabandons
People
ÒThose refineries were running before they even started
rescuing people. The lights were on over there before the lights were on
anywhere else. Because that was the concern. But if anyone would have gone to
these meetings where they were talking about this before the hurricanesÉ
believe me FEMA had plans for what was going to happen when New Orleans
flooded. And even four4
years before the storm they had Hurricane Pam. Which they made up—it was
a drill [practice run].
ÒThe drill had nothing to do with people. All of those
meetings that I attended [2001-2005],
that I listened to, I didnÕt hear them talk about people once. ThatÕs why I
started Voice of the Wetlands (www.voiceofthewetlands.com) because
we had no voice. Nobody was acknowledging that there would be people here. It
was all about oil, and infrastructure. You know the first things were
refineries and oil ports. Those are the first things on the lists of things to
do. And thatÕs exactly what happened.
ÒI get very aggravated with people thinking that FEMA messed
up [after Katrina]. Or that it was a
mistake. It was no mistake. This was a plan, they followed it to perfection,
they ended up coming out and blaming this Michael Brown cat, who wasnÕt even in
New Orleans. [(Michael Brown was the Director of FEMA]????????????? ) He
wasnÕt allowed in New Orleans until Homeland Security let him in. He was kept
in Baton Rouge, and he said that when he was testifying before a congressional
committee. The big problem was Homeland Security—---and what their agenda was.
ÒAs
soon as Homeland Security took over FEMA, people down here started paying
attention. [When was that?
Before or after the storm?] I canÕt say people in New
Orleans were there [where? Sentence doesnÕt tell me anything. Not sure
what he is saying] because they never had
to deal with FEMA. Down here we flood every three or four years from a storm
event. But New Orleans doesnÕt flood as often, you know, when we hear Homeland
Security took over FEMA, itÕs like ÒOh my god—--now what?Ó
ÒSo I really started paying attention to things and how things were run. When Homeland Security is running it, thatÕs a whole different agenda. It has nothing to do with rescuing people. Homeland Security is not a rescue operation.
ÒI did an interview with more than one person from another
country. One in particular was a guy from CanadaÉ we [FEMA]
[who? US? Fema?
Lousiana – it wasnÕt Tab but it sounds like he is involved in some
orderingÉ?] had
ordered 20,000 more body bags after Katrina, from Canada. Somebody was
investigating. And because they were saying 1300 people died, and we had 20,000
body bags in New Orleans and they ran out, and had to reorder another 20,000
body bags.Ó [2]
Blackwater, Terrorism and
Casualty Counts
ÒThey found out that Blackwater was killing people. Blackwater was just in there eradicating. If you didnÕt make it past the checkpoint and got to the dome or the convention center, or the bridge, or whatever, you were fair game.
ÒThey were claiming that they would deputize to confiscate
guns. But they were told to shoot whenever they felt like it.Ó [3] Ò
(Louisiana
Governor Kathleen Blanco did issue a Òshoot to killÓ order [4] and Blackwater issued its own press release which
stated it was in New Orleans: see www.blackwaterusa.com/press/katrina2.asp)
(Truthout.org
reporters Jeremy Scahill and Daniela Crespo
quoted Blackwater operatives in September 2005: ÒThey say they are on contract
with the Department of Homeland Security and have been given the authority to
use lethal force.Ó)
ÒEverybody here knows that there are more than 1300 people
dead. Everybody that actually got into the city and was trying to help, saw
bodies floating, saw bullet wounds. The coroner knows whatÕs going on, and he
ainÕt talking. But he knows. Because I know for a fact from some other sources
that he was saying to somebody, probably on a private level, that those bullet
wounds were military or highly powerful wounds. [(Our investigation has notedheard
the same reports from multiple, unrelated
sources.])
Those were not a
22 calibrecaliber pistols. Or a
9-millimeter pistols. LetÕs face it; criminals want to
save their lives too, in a situation like that. ItÕs not some free-for-all.
People are trying to get the hell out of there.Ó
Mass[ive] Media Malaise and/or
Cover-Up
ÒThe way it was portrayed [by media] was
totally wrong. And from what I hear from outside of this country, which really
is embarrassing to me, is that our media doesnÕt touch the stuff. I did an
interview with a guy and he was blown away every time he opens a new door, itÕs
a whole other big story that nobody is covering. He said that this thing is
like the ten -headed snake. You grab one head and
the other one is ready to bite you.
ÒThere is a story trying to go out on the Associated PressP
right now about oil and how that is why weÕre in the situation weÕre in right
now, and the guy has submitted it, ready
to go, and itÕs really a big huge step, but it hasnÕt been out
yet. This has been over a month that itÕs been submitted and it hasnÕt been out
on the wire, so, is he gonna print it? ThatÕs a whole different thing. At least
someone is willing to listen.Ó [donÕt see
what he means in these last two sentencesÉ]
Scattering
People Like Bombs
ÒThis Katrina thing was handled as if it would have been Iraq. It was handled in a military way for resources, resources were the main focus, and the only difference is that the hurricane scattered people instead of bombs. There were people getting shot, there were bodies everywhere, there was destruction everywhere, and thereÕs oil coming out of the ground like it never has before. Remind you of something else? The only difference is that we didnÕt have the equipment and the ability to fight back. We didnÕt have suicide bombers and the things that other people have.
ÒYou get knocked out, and then you get killed. Look how easy this was to do. All the peoplesÕ records were wiped out. Their city hall, their courthouses, their medical records, and their hospitals—all of that is gone. How easy is it to start taking people out at that point? ThatÕs the easiest thing in the world to be able to do.
ÒYou hide it from the media, you keep the media focused on
the [super] dome and the convention
center, and you keep giving opinionated stories about what this picture is, and
then you pull the wool over everybodyÕs eyes. I donÕt know what weÕre doing
outside of this country, but I know what I saw right here. This is a major,
major step into a civil war.
Starting right here. With these resources right here. We have the
biggest port in the country, the most important port, the mouth of the river,
it will always be that way, and we have the oil port which is the most
important port in the country. We have 40% of the oil refining capabilities in
the country, almost half of the refining is sitting right on top of us right
here [Louisiana].Ó
CNN Non-Interview
ÒI was on CNN to promote the IMAX film . (IMAX Hurricane on the
Bayou. ) The
interviewer asked me this five-part question, and I didnÕt even finish
answering the first part. Her question was longer than my answer. I didnÕt even
get to start getting into it, and they cut me off. I didnÕt even talk about oil
or anything. As soon as the cameras go out, IÕm talking to someone at the local
affiliate here, and they ask me ÒIs there anything down there we need to be
knowing about?Ó and I was like yeah, weÕve got a [oil] rig
in a neighborhood that was just blatantly in the wrong place.
ÒItÕs a brand new neighborhood thatÕs going up, and thereÕs
a brand new house being built, and then thereÕs a [(oil]) rig right next to it. Right there in
the middle of a neighborhood. This is an expansion of a neighborhood that
already existed. It didnÕt look right. We couldnÕt fight it; they had police
protection around itÉ we didnÕt know who these people were. There were unmarked
cars sitting around this rig. WeÕve never seen that before. You can usually
walk right up to a rig and nobody is gonna stop you.
ÒThere was no signage on the rig or anything like that, and
from what I was told it was a Chinese rig. [5]
ÒI donÕt know if that meant China is
drilling here or if itÕs a Chinese [oil] drill
drilling with another company, but there were no signs. [6]ThatÕs
kind of unusual too. Usually when you see an oil company that has a rig up,
theyÕre gonna have signs all over the thing.
TheyÕre proud of their logos. The people around here were kind of blown away but couldnÕt do anything about it.Ó
SO PLEASE TELL
US WHAT NEIGHBORHHOD? NINTH WARD? SOME PARISH? WHERE IS THIS?
ITS SOUND SLIKE ITS NOT THERE? DID HE SEE IT? SOMETHING ABOUT THIS DESCRIPTION
SOUNDS FUNNY.
Local Non-Government
ÒLocal governmentÉ thereÕs no government in Louisiana. There
is no such thing. As long as we have this much oil coming out of the ground,
there is no such thing as government here. And itÕs been like that since weÕve had oil
coming out of the ground. Since the Texas oil companies bought this whole
coast. All
of the swamps and marshes are owned by a Texas oil company. None of it belongs
to anybody but them. ThatÕs why they can cut it up and do anything they want.
ItÕs their property. So when weÕre trying to fight to save this stuff, weÕre
fighting to save their land. But their land is our coast and our protection.
People donÕt understand all of this. People here are so focused on working in
the oil field business, and making a living this way, that theyÕre missing
whatÕs going on.
ÒOil companies donÕt need protection. They need to fork money over to us and fix the areas that theyÕve destroyed.Ó
Hurricane on the Bayou
ÒThe IMAX film wouldnÕt let me say anything. They wouldnÕt let me touch oil.
ÒThe first levies built around the Mississippi river were to
protect farms. Channeling the river all the way to the gulfGulf was not to protect farms from
flooding. That was about choking the river down to make it deeper, blowing the
sediment out, blowing it off the continental shelf, so that they could get big
ships into there. (Ssee
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1195/htmldocs/intro.htm for an explanation of sedimentary
deposits on the continental shelf.)
ÒWe need to bring the levies down, we need to raise everybodyÕs houses like we used to be, we have to expect flooding and kind of wish for it. There was a time here when we used to pray for floods when it was dry, when they needed the ground to be replenished with that new topsoil and things like that, when we were over-farming it. Before technology, flooding was a major part of this area and a necessary part. This is what built this area, flooding. So letÕs go back to where we used to be. LetÕs expect a flood every now and then. ItÕs Mother Nature. If youÕre going to live in the swamp, you have to live with the swamp. When you build levies you give everybody this false sense of security that they can build on the ground, and theyÕre gonna be able to live there forever, and nothingÕs ever gonna happen.
ÒWell, why do people in New Orleans even think that? It should be common knowledge by now that most of New Orleans is below sea level. It wasnÕt always, but it is now. TheyÕre reliant on levies right now, every day, to survive there. You break a levy down right now; the city fills up again like it did after Katrina. Then take a hurricane and do it. All it takes is a broken levy. High tide and the south wind blowing could do it. A boat running into one of those wallsÉ.
ÒFor about two years I was flying over New Orleans every day. IÕd look down, and youÕd see the levies that are big massive levies, and those are the river levies. All of the other levies are not. Look at the river levies. They have held. There has not been a breach in one of those river levies. Look how substantial they are. If youÕre going to build a levy out of dirt, you have to go wider as you go higher. And then you have to have some kind of lining in the inside. Especially around the city, the river is bulkheaded there. When you take the Highway 310 Bridge, youÕll see that there is concrete around the inside of that levy. ThatÕs how you build levies, if youÕre going to build levies, and those are the levies that work. The problem is that those are the ones that need to come down. We need to let that river come down here, some kind of way, if weÕre going to stay here. ThatÕs the only thing thatÕs going to fix this.
ÒThe GulfGulf
is not far. ItÕs right there. ItÕs twenty miles closer to the airport than when
I was a kid. ThatÕs unbelievable amounts of land going. Swamps where I used to
go camping and think, Òlook how beautiful this is, the natural bayou with the
live oaks and on the other side of the banks thereÕs lush green Cyprus swamp,Ó
I just thought it was the most beautiful place in the world.
ÒYou have to stay pretty far north now
to see Cyprus swamps. ThereÕs miles and miles and miles of it that are dead. I
can guarantee weÕve lost, in my lifetime, IÕd say 70%.
ÒThe lake [(Pontchartrain]) is now open to the GulfGulf.
The lake is the GulfGulf.
ÒYou have to be realistic right now here. Optimism is thrown
out the window. Now weÕre in survival mode. We actually have been for a long
time, but Katrina just exaggerated it and accelerated it. So there is no more
optimism here. And understand where you stand and understand what it takes to
fix it, and go out and try to fix it if you want to stay here.
ÒThe biggest thing we have right now
is just educating people on what needs to be done and why it needs to be done
and how it was done in the first place.Ó
Next:
Part
One Baghdad
on the Bayou:
: Disaster
Capitalism and the War on Equality
America of : The Covert Resources
War Behind Katrina
Part
One: –
ÒWasting the Wetlands Economics 101Ó
[1][1]
Klein, Naomi., The
Shock Doctrine, Henry Holt and Company, New York, p. 411.
[2] Reports of as many as 70,000 body bags have been
published, but have since vanished from Internet archives. In September 2005, the
Modesto, California Bee and the AP reported, "The
federal government is trying to purchase an additional 50,000 body bags for use
in the Hurricane Katrina
cleanup and in Iraq,Ó
according to John
Hassapakis, manager
of Central Valley Professional
Services in Modesto. "Those
were sent directly
to New Orleans." Previously,
the Federal Emergency Management Administration purchased 25,000 body bags and shipped them to
New Orleans.
[3] George W. Bush instituted a Òzero toleranceÓ for
looting in the aftermath of the flood, even if someone was ÒlootingÓ Òfood or
water.Ó LouisianaÕs governor, Kathleen Blanco, added a Òshoot to killÓ order to
BushÕs Òzero toleranceÓ proclamation (see various media reports from BBC, ABC
News, CNN et al). When National Guard troops from other states
entered New Orleans five days after Katrina, troops aggressively pointed their
rifles at black survivors who approached them while seeking aid (see PeopleÕs
Hurricane Relief Fund www.peopleshurricane.org). The private
military company Blackwater
issued a press release stating they were in New Orleans: see www.blackwaterusa.com/press/katrina2.asp.
Reporters Jeremy Scahill and Daniela Crespo quoted Blackwater
operatives in September 2005: ÒThey say they are on contract with the
Department of Homeland Security and have been given the authority to use lethal
forceÓ (www.Truthout.org).
[4] George W. Bush
instituted a Òzero toleranceÓ for looting in the aftermath of the flood, even
if someone was ÒlootingÓ Òfood or water.Ó LouisianaÕs governor, Kathleen
Blanco, added a Òshoot to killÓ order to BushÕs Òzero toleranceÓ proclamation.
(see various media reports from BBC, ABC News, CNN et al) When National Guard
troops from other states made entered New Orleans five days after Katrina,
troops aggressively pointed their rifles at black survivors who approached them
while seeking aid. (PeopleÕs Hurricane Relief Fund www.peopleshurricane.org)
[5] Sun Oil &
Gas Corp., a development stage company (China 3C Group), engages in gold mining
and exploration for oil and gas principally in North America. The company has a
participation agreement in the first test well that would be drilled on the
Clovelly Prospect located in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. Sun Oil & Gas was
incorporated in 1998 as Editworks, Ltd. and changed its name to TriLucent Technologies
Corp. in 2001. Further, the company changed its name to Anza Innovations, Inc.
in 2002 and to Gaofeng Gold Corp. in 2004. Later, it changed its name to Sun
Oil & Gas Corp. [source: http://www.sunoilandgas.com; http://www.secinfo.com/d11Mkj.zc.htm]
[6] On July 14, 2006, the Registrant also completed the
acquisition of a 5% minority interest in an oil prospect property from Sterling
Grant Capital Inc. (formerly Sun Oil and Gas Corp.), a Nevada corporation located
in Baton Rouge, Louisiana (ÒSterlingÓ). The property is the Clovelly ProspectÕs
Allain-Lebreton No. 2 well (ÒClovellyÓ) which is located in southeast Louisiana
in the Lafourche Parish. [source: http://www.secinfo.com/d14yVe.vGq.htm]